New Alimony Law: What Does it Mean for You?

Divorce MediationAfter years of debate, New Jersey has a new

law, which is basically the existing law with some substantial upgrades.
In trying to fix the inequities that result when alimony obligations continue
far too long, the legislature has created guidelines to apply when determining,
modifying or terminating an alimony obligation.

First, permanent alimony has been removed from our law. If you are married
or in a civil union (collectively referred to as “marriage”
hereafter) for more than 20 years, the court can award something called
“open durational” alimony. It is not intended to be permanent
and will end in most circumstances, typically at retirement, which we
discuss later. Under the old law, alimony obligations really could last
forever and the burden on the payor spouse to modify or terminate alimony,
even at retirement, was substantial. Judges differed widely on the burden
of proof needed to modify or terminate alimony.

In marriages less than 20 years, our law has been in flux for many years.
Many years ago, we had an appellate case suggest that a marriage of 10
years was not short-term and an award of permanent alimony was appropriate.
This led many people to argue for long-term alimony awards in relatively
short marriages. More recently, our appellate division ruled that a marriage
of 15 years precludes a court awarding limited duration alimony, if alimony
is appropriate, meaning that if a court were to award alimony, it would
be left with permanent alimony (with or lieu of rehabilitative and/or
reimbursement alimony). Thanks to our new alimony law, the vast majority
of people with a marriage less than 20 years need not worry about long-term
alimony obligations. More specifically, the maximum length of an alimony
obligation is now the length of your marriage, except in exceptional circumstances.
We think it is important to note that this is not a guideline as to the
length, but merely a ceiling on the length. In other words, the changes
to the law do not mean that a marriage of 13 years results in an alimony
award of 13 years, but that the duration can be no more than 13 years.
As such, there is still plenty that parties will be unfortunately fighting
about when coming up with the duration of an alimony award. You need an
to ensure you are treated fairly when it comes to the duration and the
amount of alimony.

The new law also places an emphasis on both parties being entitled to maintain
a lifestyle comparable to the marital standard of living, with neither
party having a greater entitlement to that standard. Our law has drifted
away from the ability of the payor spouse to pay alimony and much more
toward the needs of the payee spouse over the years. The changes to our
alimony law seeks to reverse that trend.

For parties that are already
with alimony obligations, the new bill provides plenty of opportunities
to modify or terminate alimony. In the case of retirement, there is now
a rebuttable presumption that alimony shall terminate at age 67. That
means anyone who is currently paying alimony can retire and petition the
court to terminate alimony when they turn 67. The court must terminate
alimony unless the other party shows good cause to overcome the rebuttable
presumption of retirement. This is very good news for payors of alimony
and is really not unfair to recipients, as everyone should be permitted
to retire and enjoy the fruits of their work without the dark cloud of
alimony hanging over their heads.

In the case of unemployment, we have long had inconsistent rulings from
judges on what constitutes a permanent change in circumstances. The court
cannot modify alimony if a payor has incurred a “temporary”
change in circumstances, whether that is unemployment or a diminution
in income. The key question has always been: what is temporary? The alimony
statute has been amended to suggest that unemployment or reduction in
income of 90 days or more should permit a payor to apply to the court
for a modification of alimony. The new law specifically says that the
modification or termination of alimony in the case of change in circumstances
can be retroactive to the date the unemployment and reduction in income
commenced and gives the court some guidance to consider temporary modifications
if appropriate.

Finally, the new law sets forth factors for the court to access in determining
whether alimony should be terminated or modified in the case of cohabitation.
While we have had case law on cohabitation for many years, courts have
been inconsistent in how facts have been reviewed when cohabitation applications
have been brought before the court.

The factors the court must now consider include:

  1. Intertwined finances, such as joint bank accounts
  2. Sharing or joint responsibility for living expenses
  3. Recognition of the relationship in the couple’s social and family circle
  4. Living together, the frequency of contact, the duration of the relationship,
    and other indicia of a mutually supportive intimate personal relationship
  5. Sharing of household chores
  6. Whether the recipient of alimony has received an enforceable promise of
    support from another person (i.e., palimony)
  7. Any other relevant evidence. Finally, the court cannot fail to find cohabitation
    simply because the couple does not live together on a full-time basis

The New Jersey Alimony attorneys at Netsquire – Previte Nachlinger, P.C. can help you navigate
this new law. If you have any questions about the new alimony law and
what it means for you, please call us to
at (732) 479-4711.

About the Author


John Nachlinger is a co-founder and managing attorney of Netsquire, a family law firm focused on streamlining divorces through effective mediation, settlement drafting, and court filing assistance. As a New Jersey Supreme Court Certified Matrimonial Law Attorney and Qualified Mediator, John guides couples toward equitable agreements without the cost and stress of litigation.

Recognized as a New Jersey Super Lawyer for over a decade, John’s client-focused approach aims to foster understanding during challenging transitions. With a background spanning top law journals, judicial clerkships, and boutique family law firms, John now applies his analytical skills to create workable solutions for all parties. His mediation services reshape the divorce journey by prioritizing compassion and compromise.

LinkedIn | State Bar Association | Avvo | Google