Alimony Decision From The NJ Supreme Court: What Does It Mean For You?

Scales of Justice - Family Law in NJ

Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of
Gnall v. Gnall. In short, the issue before the court was whether a marriage of 15 years
could result in limited duration alimony or whether it must result in
permanent alimony (now known as open duration alimony). In order to understand
the case and its holding, it is important to understand that there are
four types of
in New Jersey.

  1. Open Durational Alimony allows the dependent spouse, after a marriage of
    more than 20 years, where there was economic interdependence, to live
    a substantially similar lifestyle to the marital lifestyle with no pre-defined end date.
  2. Limited Duration Alimony addresses the dependent spouse’s needs to
    maintain a lifestyle similar to that enjoyed during a short to moderate
    length marriage of less than 20 years, where economic assistance for a
    limited time would be fair and equitable under the circumstances. The
    term cannot exceed the length of the marriage.
  3. Rehabilitative Alimony provides financial support to one spouse while he
    or she prepares to re-enter the workforce through training or education
    in order to improve their earning capacity and therefore become economically
  4. Reimbursement Alimony is awarded when one spouse made financial sacrifices
    to allow the other spouse to secure an advanced degree, license, or otherwise
    enhance the parties’ future standard of living.

Under the alimony statute, the trial court must consider thirteen separate
factors in determining an alimony award. These factors include:

  • The actual need and ability of the parties to pay
  • The duration of the marriage or civil union
  • The age, physical, and emotional health of the parties
  • The standard of living established in the marriage or civil union and the
    likelihood that each party can maintain a reasonably comparable standard of living
  • The earning capacities, educational levels, vocational skills, and employability
    of the parties
  • The length of absence from the job market of the party seeking maintenance
  • The parental responsibilities for the children
  • The time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient education or training
    to enable the party seeking maintenance to find appropriate employment
  • The history of the financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage
    or civil union by each party including contributions to the care and education
    of the children and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities
  • The equitable distribution of property ordered
  • The income available to either party through investment of any assets held
    by that party
  • The tax treatment and consequences to both parties of any alimony award
  • Any other factors which the court may deem relevant

Gnall, the New Jersey Supreme Court took note of the fact that the trial court
did not properly consider all of the necessary factors listed above, but
instead made its decision solely on the length of the marriage. The trial
court made a finding that indicated that only marriages lasting twenty-five
years or more would be appropriate for permanent alimony and therefore
awarded limited duration alimony. The Appellate Division reversed and
made a non-purposeful bright line rule that a fifteen year marriage warrants
permanent alimony. Neither decision indicated that the length of the marriage
was considered, along with the other factors, in reaching those conclusions.
Case law consistently stands for the idea that
all thirteen factors must be considered and given due weight; the NJ Supreme
Court continues to stand by this principle. Therefore, the NJ Supreme
Court reversed the Appellate Division’s holding and remanded the
case back to the trial court for a new determination of alimony.

What does this case mean for you? Our new alimony law does not allow a court to order open duration alimony
(formally permanent alimony) unless the marriage lasted 20 years or more,
except in exceptional circumstances. In marriages of 20 years or less,
only limited durational, rehabilitative and reimbursement alimony can
be awarded, with the terms not exceeding the length of the marriage, again
except in exceptional circumstances. Applying this new case to our new
alimony law, it is clear that in marriages of 20 years or less, there
is no mathematical formula for the duration of an alimony award due to
the specific length of a marriage. The NJ Supreme Court has restated the
principle that trial court must consider all of the thirteen statutory
factors in determining the duration, amount, and type of alimony award.

If you have any questions on how this case may affect your situation,
and NJ Family Law Attorneys at NJ Divorce
Solutions for an initial consultation.

Our associate, Marissa Hirsch, Esq., contributed to this blog article.

About the Author


John Nachlinger is a co-founder and managing attorney of Netsquire, a family law firm focused on streamlining divorces through effective mediation, settlement drafting, and court filing assistance. As a New Jersey Supreme Court Certified Matrimonial Law Attorney and Qualified Mediator, John guides couples toward equitable agreements without the cost and stress of litigation.

Recognized as a New Jersey Super Lawyer for over a decade, John’s client-focused approach aims to foster understanding during challenging transitions. With a background spanning top law journals, judicial clerkships, and boutique family law firms, John now applies his analytical skills to create workable solutions for all parties. His mediation services reshape the divorce journey by prioritizing compassion and compromise.

LinkedIn | State Bar Association | Avvo | Google